Which Autism Treatments Should Insurance Cover?

Todd Fugere's picture
Insurance should only cover autism treatment for children under age 21.
0% (0 votes)
Insurance should cover autism treatment for all ages.
25% (1 vote)
Insurance should cover only traditional therapies such as speech, PT, and medications.
0% (0 votes)
Insurance should cover traditional therapies and Applied Behavior Analysis.
25% (1 vote)
Insurance should cover any NON-biomedical treatment recommended by a medical doctor.
0% (0 votes)
Insurance should cover any NON-biomedical treatment recommended by a certified practitioner.
0% (0 votes)
Insurance should cover ALL treatments recommended by a medical doctor.
25% (1 vote)
Insurance should cover ALL treatments recommended by a certified practitioner
0% (0 votes)
Insurance should cover any treatment NOT provided through schools.
25% (1 vote)
Insurance should not cover treatment for autism.
0% (0 votes)
Total votes: 4

I hate polls because I

Perseverence's picture

I hate polls because I always seem to find myself wanting to chose options not provided - lol. As a Canadian, I probably shouldn't vote in this one anyway. I am a staunch supporter of public health care that covers everything related to actual health (as opposed to beautification). It is a more humane experience for a person to go to a good doctor and not have to worry about the financial end of things. However, the financining of such a system is increasingly becoming a big issue in Canada; and many Canadians are looking at U.S. healthcare/insurance models to solve the problem. For instance, many localities find it difficult to keep doctors (who often find better-paying practices in foreign countries or in bigger cities). Concerns with "going private", of course, center around the development of a two-tiered system (one for the rich and an inferior one for the poor) may develop. Under the scenariio presented, I would also worry about the development of multiple two-tiered systems of different sorts; say, one for autistic people under 21 and another one for those over 21; one for less-expensive and more clearly defined disabilities and another for autism (even though it is no less debilitating).

Who pays and how - that is the question, isn't it.